Updated 7/11/10
Does this image ring a bell?
True Blood is alluding to Janet Leigh’s iconographic scream in Alfred Hitchcock’s, Psycho, the first psychoanalytical thriller.
That’s because True Blood is full of psycho serial killers: René, Amy, Maryann, Eggs, Steve, Luke, Lorena, Franklin Mott, and Bill.
Maxine called Hoyt Norman Bates, but she was wrong. In True Blood, it is Bill Compton who is Norman Bates.
To begin with, Bill has a creepy dilapidated house of horrors on a hill, just like Norman.
And the beautiful blond woman he’s interested in lives just across the field, just like Norman.
There’s a big old dead tree, a tree with two branches stretched out like arms outside of her house. Not too different from the one that was in Sookie’s front yard.
People seem to die all around him, and he has mother issues. Boy does he have mother issues, just like Norman. The words used to describe Norman’s mother, when she was still alive, could equally be said of Bill’s, “She was a clinging demanding woman, and for years the two of them lived as if there was no one else in the world.”
Of course Norman Bates keeps his dead mother alive only in his head while Bill’s is kept alive, like all vampires, by magic.
Norman keeps his dead mother’s body in his house.
Bill’s mother kept dead bodies in the house.
His ward does, too, for that matter. It seems to be a family trait. Does Bill have any bodies stashed away, making him even more Norman-like?
If Bill is psycho like Norman, it is his mother that triggers his murderous rage. We know that he hates her and resents her for giving him life, for make no mistake, that’s what she did. Lorena conferred life on Bill, not death. He acknowledged that he would have been dead within a day if he had not found Lorena. There is no way he would have made it 20 miles back home to Bon Temps without her. It is not life that Bill wishes for. It is his death that Lorena stole from him.
To understand the how Bill sees Lorena, we have to remember that vampires don’t view age the same way we do. Pam can’t judge human ages the same way we can’t judge vampire ages. Vampires seem to be able to though. Jessica has been characterized as a baby vamp. Bill, in his dream, on his knees, three years a vampire, with his mother constantly hovering over him, was a toddler, and Pam, judging from her sarcasm, eye rolling, and interaction with Lafayette, is a teen at 100 years old. So, if vampires see the internal age of the vampire instead of the frozen image we do, when Bill looks at his mother, he sees the same thing that Godric did, an old vampire.
Probably something closer to the way that Gran or Olivia look than this:
That is why he lashes out at elderly women when he’s enraged by Lorena. The first time we saw this was when Bill was reminded of his family by Mayor Norris and of Lorena by Andy’s interest in his wrought iron toaster. Soon after those two events, Sookie finds Gran dead, stabbed over fifty times with a knife and nearly decapitated.
René has no association with a knife, committing all of his murders with his belt. However, the night that someone cut the screen to enter Sookie’s room and stab Gran, Bill was shown in his flashback cutting his way into Lorena’s cabin with one that looked to be about 14-16 inches long, about the size that would have been used to murder Gran.
Make no mistake, René did not kill Adele Stackhouse. Bill did and subsequently implanted a false memory of the crime into René’s head. There are several clues to what happened in René’s memory. The first and most obvious being that his memory does not coincide with the actual crime scene. In René’s mind, Adele fell face down.
You might think that was done to conceal the identity of the stand-in that was used, but we are shown the actor’s face clearly throughout the scene.
Bill also murdered Olivia. As he approached her house, this is what he was remembering:
When he entered, this is what he recalled.

When he approached Lorena’s cabin, starving and in pain his upper arm and left breast were bleeding. Gus and Cooter cut him in the same places renewing that old painful memory.
Notice the gaping hole in Bill’s chest.
So Bill was reliving his last human moments, dirty, hungry, and hurting, when he found the same thing in Olivia’s house that he found in Lorena’s, food, which he fell on eagerly and devoured.
But you thought that Bill just took a little blood, cleaned Olivia up, put a fresh nightgown on her, bandaged her wounds, inserted her oxygen tube, and glamoured her, right?
Didn’t you pay attention to the video about how to survive a werewolf attack? Staying hydrated is of primary importance. In fact, in the video, Bill, confronting four wolves and ripping Louie’s ear off, is the poster boy for a well fed vampire.
If three healthy hydrated vampires can drain Destiny just to fulfill their daily nutritional requirements, what would a starving vampire do to a little old lady in poor health, even assuming that he didn’t give her a heart attack?
The issue becomes, if Bill killed Olivia, how did we see him glamour her? The answer is that Sookie is narrating the show. She only knows what Bill at some point in the future will tell her about the incident, and we know what a liar Bill is.
We think Bill glamoured Olivia because that’s what he told Sookie he did.
The clues are there for those not willing to buy into Bill’s version of the event. In addition to the attack instruction manual, there is Rene’s false memory of Gran’s murder. Notice the cane back chairs. These are the dining room chairs. Bill is as confused about human eating areas as Pam is about human ages because they are meaningless to him now. Also note image that looks like a glass of red wine on the table. That is not wine, it’s syrup, but it represents Gran in Bill’s mind. She is just a vessel that contains his food.
Bill makes the same mistake at Olivia’s house, confusing the dining room and kitchen. Her dining room table is in the breakfast room, and the breakfast table is in the dining room.* To get oriented, Olivia is standing in her living room. Behind her you can see the edge of the piano on the left and the table on the right with the change of flooring from carpet to linoleum.
The problem is that isn’t her breakfast table. It is the larger, nicer dining room table with a decorative centerpiece. Take a close look at that basket. Click on the second image to see the larger size. The basket has a red design in the shape of a wine glass. It corresponds to the image that looks like a glass of wine on Gran’s table, and tells us what Bill really sees when he looks at Olivia. She is the vessel that he intends to drink from. When Olivia walks by the basket and turns asking Bill what he would like to eat, he attacks.
The smaller messy breakfast table with dirty dishes and the detritus of daily life isn’t in the breakfast room. It’s behind the sofa in the otherwise pristine combined living and dining space. Bill’s lack of discernment when it comes to dining spaces has once again caused him to put the furniture in the wrong rooms. We are only given a glimpse of this table after Bill has glamoured us and after he has drained Olivia. Notice the empty glass on the table. Olivia is now an empty vessel because Bill has drained her. Not coincidentally, after he drains Sookie, an empty glass appears on her bedside table at the hospital.
Bill didn’t just leave behind an empty glass, he also apparently left a cleaned plate.* See it on the wall over Bill’s shoulder? It was not there before.
The screencap below isn’t definitive, but in the show, there is a clear view of the whole area with no plate to be seen as Olivia leads Bill to the kitchen.
Bill drained the glass and cleaned the plate when he killed Olivia recalling his last human meal at Lorena’s when he did the same thing.
Added:
One of the interpretations of Psycho is that Norman’s house represents his id, ego, and superego. Mother lives upstairs in the superego, Norman is usually seen on the first floor representing the rational ego, and the basement represents the id. When Norman moves Mother from upstairs to the basement he is reinforcing the strong connection between the id and the superego. This coincides with the True Blood analysis I did identifying Lorena as Bill’s superego. In fact, Russell’s house could be equated with Norman’s. Lorena spends much more time with Bill upstairs in the superego part of house. Russell spends most time with him on the first floor, the ego, which is what he represents, and Lorena ends up in the slave quarters, Bill’s id.
*Thanks to Enjoying and Sunny Nala for their detailed observations of Olivia’s house **This post is based on Sunny Nala’s ideas about what really happened to Gran and Olivia.***Screencaps courtesy of truebloodnet.com andDaydreaming. ****’Psycho’ is based a novel of the same name by Robert Bloch. The novel was based on the crimes of Wisconsin serial killer Ed Geincontinuing AB’s pattern of drawing from sources that have multiple iterations.





































A few eps from now I feel confident you will be able to add Caroline Compton (and possibly one or both of her children) to your gallery of the macabre.
No doubt.
As Dazedrose just said over at SVB, Bill LIKES bloody murdering. After what we saw in Chicago (and know from the BR commentaries) we know Bill and Lorena were a couple of slaughter-happy psychos. Why the refusal to even consider he might have killed Gran?
the only reason im skeptical that Bill killed Gran was because i thought sookie saw renee kill gran when she looked inside his head
See I thought that too, but couldn’t a vampire glamour of ‘I was never here, you walked in and gran took you by surpise …and then stabbity stab stab’ Put that in their people’s heads too? Like him telling the dude at the airport …or Old lady what’s her name. /Theory.
Right. The precedent has been set that Bill can implant false memories via glamour.
I know I belabor this point to exhaustion, but Rene’s memory of killing Gran makes no sense. In the memory he tells Gran ‘you weren’t supposed to be here!’ Umm, why would Rene think GRAN would be out of the house at that time of night while expecting Sookie, whom he KNEW to be on a date with Sam, to be home?
And why would he kill her anyway? Gran was not who he was after, supposedly, so what was the point? Couldn’t he have just hidden himself in the house until Sookie came home? And if Gran did surprise him why didn’t he just strangle her like he did the others?
The anomalies tell us the memory is a lie just like the anomalies in the Olivia scene tell us it is a lie. First, Bill struck that poor frail old woman like a cobra–if a heart attack didn’t kill her–she was facing him when he struck– the force of the attack would have. Second, where is the blood? I said this over at SVB but my grandmothers skin was so tissue-thin the merest scratch caused her skin to bleed profusely. Olivia SHOULD have been covered in blood from such a forceful attack but there was no blood on her at all, nor were there any fang marks.
His clean shiny shoes are a metaphor for Bill scrubbing this scene of ‘dirt’ and polishing it to a high shine.
Sunny, Bill didn’t even need to put a fresh gown on Olivia, and we know what a messy eater he is in normal circumstances. Hungry and recalling Lorena’s attack on him, there is no way he just took a few gentlemanly sips and bandaged Olivia up.
Sunny, Bill didn’t even need to put a fresh gown on Olivia, and we know what a messy eater he is in normal circumstances. Hungry and recalling Lorena’s attack on him, there is no way he just took a few gentlemanly sips and bandaged Olivia up.
OMG, I keep thinking of his words to her: ‘you will forget what I did to you’. What if he raped her as well? The money in the false memory would then represent Bill’s misogynistic view of ‘slatternly’ women and their sexuality.
ROTFL! Sunny, you are fearless, and go where I fear to tread.
I do think the mother issues, the fact that Gran and Olivia look like what Lorena should, the fact that they’re both wearing nightgowns, and Bill’s association of blood with sex is suggestive.
I loved this article for a long time.
you should check out my new Body Language article on
True Blood Villains.
I’ll be sure to. Thanks TTB!
See? Logic and foreshadowing, down the tubes in favor of Bill’s delusions. Will we ever get the truth about Caroline and Tommy or will his delusional dream stand as the reality?
Damn, this comment was in response to my own earlier comment evincing confidence that we will be shown Bill killing Caroline.
A few eps from now I feel confident you will be able to add Caroline Compton (and possibly one or both of her children) to your gallery of the macabre.
We all have our ups and downs.
LOL!
I can’t really recall fully now, but didn’t Rene kill usually by strangulation? And he stalked the victims enough before hand to know that they’d either be alone, or incapacitated (like Amy& Jason in a V induced sleep) Hmm. Where as the stabbing seems very OOC for him as does missing his intended victim.
Yes, just like in the movie Frenzy, René strangled women who had relationships with his best friend, but he used his belt instead of a tie. My feeling is he probably watched Jason with his conquests and killed them afterward. There’s a hint this is the case when René enters Maudette’s and she thinks Jason has returned.
Not only is a bloody violent kill uncharacteristic for René, Mike said that Gran was nearly decapitated. If René was surprised by Gran and grabbed a knife, it is unimaginable that he would attack her with that much rage.
I understand what you all are saying here….but I just can’t quite get my head around Bill killing Gran. I do totally see how weird it is that she was knifed to death when all of the other women were strangled, though. I guess I just have a hard time believing that AB would bring the Bill character on TB down that far. I totally want the edict to be revealed and for Sookie to dump Bill, but I just can’t see AB giving irrefutable evidence on the show that Bill murdered Gran. I did notice the similarities between the scene between Bill and Olivia when he walks up to her house and the scene with Bill and Lorena in the Civil War flashback. I also noticed the bizarrely clean shoes and the unrealistically clean nightgown. Yikes! I guess I just can’t completely relinquish a tiny bit of faith in TB Bill not being a completely evil character. I can’t see how Sookie would survive emotionally finding out that he killed her grandmother. I guess I will have to watch and see. I do really appreciate all of the intelligent posts here and look forward to reading more of your analysis!
I found the proof that René’s memory was false! Look at the image of Gran’s body above. It is face up. About 6 feet away is a chair that is laying on its side.
In René’s memory, Gran fell face down and knocked over the chair as she fell. It was so close to her body that there wasn’t room for her right arm to be fully extended as it is in the image above.
OMG!
Just want to make a note here that Maxine called Hoyt Norman Bates when he wouldn’t let her leave the house.
Renee put this early on to night
Should have put it here ,
Ck 3-1
Oliver Table Bill going in is a clear bowl and clean
Bill going out it a color bowl ,a book, papers
Interesting! I’ll check it out. Thanks for sharing.
You are welcome please ck it out
OK, I’ve been hot on this all morning, and it turns out to be VERY interesting and VERY important.
At Olivia’s Bill goes in the front door with it’s high row of windows and passes the dining room table, which only has an empty decorative bowl on it.
When he leaves, he rushes out the back door which has three rows of windows and past a table full of clutter that is obviously well used.
This is very confusing with the way Olivia’s house is shot. It does initially appear that Bill went by the same table and out the same door that he entered.
Bill using both doors may relate to Gran’s murder. He would have gone out the front door and then returned through the back. I don’t believe he’s ever approached the house that way before, has he? That night he went in the back because he wanted to leave the front door and screen just as the ‘killer’ left it, coinciding with Sookie’s error in the police report for Dawn’s murder.
We were intended to get Olivia’s dining and breakfast rooms mixed up in our minds because Rene did the same thing in his memory. The chairs in Olivia’s breakfast room are exactly like the chairs in Gran’s kitchen. They are notably different from the dining room chairs in both houses.
In Rene’s memory, Gran is sitting at the kitchen table, but the chairs are the ones from the dining room. Another indication that Rene isn’t really remembering Gran is the fact that in his memory, Gran is not even present. People, I do believe have our second sighting of a shemale. Take a look at these screencaps of Rene’s memory. This person is not Gran. AB is playing with us and giving us a red flag that things are not as they appear to be.
http://photogallery.truebloodnet.com/displayimage.php?album=19&pos=161
The confusion about Gran and Olivia’s dining rooms carries over to Bill’s dream because the plantation office, clearly a period room, is replaced with Sookie’s diningroom, with yellow wallpaper and cream wainscoting that doesn’t relate at all to the rest of Bill’s house. I believe that in Bill’s mind dining areas are confused since he doesn’t have any use for them. They just all blend together for him.
Sookie’s dining room in Bill’s house during his dream has implications for another murder. Thomas’s body is laid out in the imaginary dining room implies that Bill turned his son into food and ate him, basically the same thing Joe Lee is doing by forcing Tommy to support the family.
OMG OMG, my mind is nearly blown Renee! This took some time and thought, my dear friend, and you have found the proof to the whole conspiracy!
Am I seeing things? There is a glass of red liquid (representing vampire ‘food’ on a dining table) in what looks like a wine glass on Gran’s table in Rene’s ‘memory’! I don’t think Gran was the type to drink wine and why would she put red punch, kool-aid, or juice in a wine glass? Feeding us ‘kool-aid’ indeed!
I’m off to check out the kool-aid, but I have to give props to Enjoying first. It was her eagle eyes that cracked this whole conspiracy.
Great catch MC! The basket on Olivia’s table has a design on the side that is shaped like a red wine glass. Right after Bill walks past it is when he attacks her then as he runs past the breakfast table and out the door, you can see an empty glass on that table.
I’m going to see about working this up into a post.
Actually I decided it would work better to update this post rather than starting a new one.
Actually I have to take back what I said about Gran’s chair’s being at Olivia’s. I was basing that on photos that only showed the top wrung. (New photos and text updated above, btw).
The chairs are different. Gran’s furniture stays in her house, but the chairs are confused in Rene’s memory with the DR chairs in the kitchen and the furntiture is again confused at Olivia’s because that scene is from Bill’s POV.
I tell you what, AB is one crafty bastard.
Renée… Can I found a fanclub for you? XD
Glad you liked it, Melody!
Oh, wanted to ask, do you think Gran’s stand in is male?
It sure looks like it to me. I can just hear AB and the directors telling the elderly actress they didn’t want her doing such a strenuous and gory scene and that she needed a stunt double!
LOL! Yes, and they deliberately ended Rene’s memory with the stunt double face down instead of just showing him falling with his face away from the camera and then cutting to the real death scene. They deliberately recreated that whole scene and it cannot be because they didn’t want to reveal the standin’s face since at the beginning when Gran is sitting at the table, you can’t get any more full frontal than that.
Look at ‘Gran’s’ mouth in Rene’s false memory. It looks smeared with red lipstick and is distorted in a macabre sort of grimace.
Yes. The whole sequence is bizarre and the images are all badly degraded. While she’s sitting at the table, Gran’s hands almost look like a combination of MA’s claws and Sookie’s fairy glow.
When I watch it at 1/15 there is a frame or two that looks more like Bill in his blue shirt than Rene. The problem is it’s just too distorted to make the case.
a frame or two that looks more like Bill in his blue shirt than Rene.
Yes I noticed that, and I also noticed that Rene was wearing khaki’s, just like Bill was wearing that night. I don’t think we ever saw Rene in anything but dark jeans but I could be mistaken.
Even on his big date night to propose to Arlene he wore jeans.
WOW. That is incredible. You guys rock, and I include Enjoying in jaw dropping admiration. I wonder if there will more homage to Hitchcock? I was struck by a phrase used to describe the protagonist in Vertigo..caught in a never ending spiral of deception and obsession….hmmm.
Hi Bobsgran! I’ve been thinking that there may be a lot of Hitchock in TB that we haven’t caught yet. TB has been repeatedly using a camera trick of making us think someone is vertical and then turning the camera to show they’re horizontal accompanied with a turning/grinding sound, most notably when Sookie wakes up disoriented in FT. I think that might be from Vertigo. It’s been decades since I saw it, so I got a new copy but I haven’t had a chance to watch yet. If this camera technique is from Vertigo, there should be other connections as well.
The same thing happened when she woke up from the second dream, when she and Jason were riding home in the Anubis van.
Well, in Vertigo Kim Novak’s character transforms herself into the image of what of what the Jimmy Stewart character wants.
Yes, watched last night and there are tons of connections, most notably the one you mentioned and the shock doctrine. Barbara Bel Geddes learned all about it from her doctor who says the only way to cure a fear of heights (Are you listening Eric and Jason?) is with a shock to the system.
OK, not to throw water on this whole thing because it’s awesome! But! What we’re looking at here is two different rooms, or dining areas.
The one Olivia goes into, directly across from the front door, to fetch Bill some food should be the kitchen, though it is suspiciously free of appliances and the acoutrements of a kitchen–Bill: “I don’t have a refrigerator”– See the linoleum?:
http://black-celebration.net/caps/displayimage.php?pid=936857&fullsize=1
The other eating area should be the formal dining area, which is directly behind the couch and to the left of the front door. You can see the kitchen in this shot:
http://black-celebration.net/caps/displayimage.php?pid=936973&fullsize=1
But wait! What’s that on the wall between the painting and the doorframe of the kitchen? Why, it looks like a large wooden wall plaque (not visible in this cap but is very plain in the ep) and beneath it a small decorative plate, neither of which was there earlier:
http://black-celebration.net/caps/displayimage.php?pid=936865&fullsize=1
So is this Bill confusing the two rooms again?
No, they actually ARE two distinct areas. The one Olivia goes into to find food for Bill SHOULD BE the kitchen, but it doesn’t really look like one.
The other eating area is behind the couch that Olivia is laying on when Bill glamours ‘her’. This area is to the left of the front door–you can orient the whole layout from my second link.
I think we’re seeing the same thing. They are two different rooms, but Gran’s kitchen chairs are in what I identified as the breakfast room with the empty glass (behind the couch) near the back door and the clean table is near the front door. You can see a dining room chair through the passage in your 2nd link.
What I was saying was there are two rooms, but because of how the scene was shot, it was very confusing reflecting Bill’s inattention to eating spaces which hold no meaning for him (Pam has this same problem with her inability to discern human ages.) So, on first impressions the two spaces did look like the same table and door to most viewers.
Bill confuses the two tables in Gran’s putting the DR chairs in the kitchen when he glamours Rene. When he glamors us, he does the same thing. He puts put Gran’s kitchen chairs at Olivis’s messy breakfast table. Olivia’s dining room chairs are accurate because we see them before Bill glamours us.
The new part I’m getting from you is that Bill actually went in the backdoor and through the kitchen and then passed the diningroom table and out the front door, and it appears like the function of those two rooms was switched, again because of Bill’s inattention to these areas.
Let me see if I’m reading you right. The rooms I identified in Olivia’s as the dining and breakfast rooms are actually switched? You think Bill came to the back door instead of the front?
No, it seems Bill came in the front door and went out the side door. The door in the kitchen seems to lead into a laundry room which would likely contain the back door.
In this photo I think we are seeing the outside door frame blocking the plate and plaque in the interior wall.
Watch the ep itself. As Olivia heads to the kitchen, you can see the painting of the rocky shoreline to her right with a blank wall between it and the righthand doorframe of the kitchen. You can also see the painting in the cap of Bill kneeling in front of her as she lies on the couch, but now the plaque and the plate have magically appeared on the formerly blank wall.
Ok. What I was calling the back would actually be the side. Looking straight in through the front door where Bill came in, Olivia is standing in the living room. You can see her piano from the door. She leads Bill past the table we can see from the front door. I was calling that the dining room table, but logically it should be the breakfast room as you were saying, but it is the wrong table. The smaller well used breakfast table is in front of the side door behind the couch where the dining table should be. So we do have a case of Bill mixing up the rooms, right? The dining table is on the linoleum in the breakfast room, and the breakfast table in adjoining the living room.
Yep!
Whew! Glad I got that straight! So you didn’t rain on my parade, you brought more confetti!
ROTFL! The plate does appear on the wall after Bill ate his dinner, and that is also the only time we can see the empty glass on the round table behind the sofa.
About the plate–
In this photo I think we are seeing the outside door frame blocking the plate and plaque in the interior wall.
http://black-celebration.net/caps/displayimage.php?pid=936857&fullsize=1
Renee, I just put up a comment with three links–sorry!–which has me hung up in moderation!
Got it!
Thank You All for cking that out.
For some reason that 3-1 just didn’t feel right when I watch in again so I went back over Bill and Oliver .
Taking what you guys have said and it hit me about the table .
This all so like with the bathroom and Tara .
LOL Have go back one day and rewath ever thing again to see what all I have miss.
It’s you we owe thanks to for sharing your observations. This is a major break in the caes! ROTFL!
This more of a personal reminder to explore these issues further than a comment.
Interpretations of ‘Pscyho’ from Wikipedia that may have implications for ‘True Blood.’
Subversion of romance through irony
In Psycho, Hitchcock subverts the romantic elements that are seen in most of his work. The film is instead ironic as it prevents “clarity and fulfillment” of romance. The past is central to the film; the main characters “struggle to understand and resolve destructive personal histories” and ultimately fail. Lesley Brill writes, “The inexorable forces of past sins and mistakes crush hopes for regeneration and present happiness.” The crushed hope is highlighted by the death of the protagonist, Marion Crane, halfway through the film. Marion is likePersephone of Greek mythology, who is abducted temporarily from the world of living. The myth does not sustain with Marion, who dies hopelessly in her room at Bates Motel. The room is wallpapered with floral print like Persephone’s flowers, but they are only “reflected in mirrors, as images of images—twice removed from reality”. In the scene of Marion’s death, Brill describes the transition from the bathroom drain to Marion’s lifeless eye, “Like the eye of the amorphous sea creature at the end of Fellini’s La Dolce Vita, it marks the birth of death, an emblem of final hopelessness and corruption.” Unlike heroines in Hitchcock’s other films, she does not reestablish her innocence or discover love.
Marion is deprived of “the humble treasures of love, marriage, home, and family”, which Hitchcock considers elements of human happiness. There exists among Psycho’s secondary characters a lack of “familial warmth and stability”, which demonstrates the unlikelihood of domestic fantasies. The film contains ironic jokes about domesticity, such as when Sam writes a letter to Marion, agreeing to marry her, only after the audience sees her buried in the swamp. Sam and Marion’s sister Lila, in investigating Marion’s disappearance, develop an “increasingly connubial” relationship, a development that Marion is denied.Norman also suffers a similarly perverse definition of domesticity. He has “an infantile and divided personality” and lives in a mansion whose past occupies the present. Norman displays stuffed birds that are “frozen in time” and keeps childhood toys and stuffed animals in his room. He is hostile toward suggestions to move from the past, such as with Marion’s suggestion to put his mother “someplace” and as a result kills Marion to preserve his past. Brill explains, ‘Someplace’ for Norman is where his delusions of love, home, and family are declared invalid and exposed.”
Light and darkness feature prominently in Psycho. The first shot after the intertitle is the sunny landscape of Phoenix before the camera enters a dark hotel room where Sam and Marion appear as bright figures. Marion is almost immediately cast in darkness; she is preceded by her shadow as she reenters the office to steal money and as she enters her bedroom. When she flees Phoenix, darkness descends on her drive. The following sunny morning is punctured by a watchful police officer with black sunglasses, and she finally arrives at Bates Motel in near darkness. Bright lights are also “the ironic equivalent of darkness” in the film, blinding instead of illuminating. Examples of brightness include the opening window shades in Sam and Marion’s hotel room, vehicle headlights at night, the neon sign at Bates Motel, “the glaring white” of the bathroom tiles where Marion dies, and the fruit cellar’s exposed light bulb shining on the corpse of Norman’s mother. Such bright lights typically characterize danger and violence in Hitchcock’s films.
Motifs
The film often features shadows, mirrors, windows, and, less so, water. The shadows are present from the very first scene where the blinds make bars on Marion and Sam as they peer out the window. The stuffed birds’ shadows loom over Marion as she eats, and Norman’s mother is seen in only shadows until the very end. More subtly, backlighting turns the rakes in the hardware store into talons above Lila’s head.
Mirrors reflect Marion as she packs, her eyes as she checks the rear-view mirror, her face in the policeman’s sunglasses, and her hands as she counts out the money in the car dealership’s bathroom. A motel window serves as a mirror by reflecting Marion and Norman together. Hitchcock shoots through Marion’s windshield and the telephone booth, when Arbogast phones Sam and Lila. The heavy downpour can be seen as foreshadowing of the shower, and it letting up can be seen as a symbol of Marion making up her mind to return to Phoenix.
There are a number of references to birds. Marion’s last name is Crane and she is from Phoenix. Norman’s hobby is stuffing birds, and he comments that Marion eats like a bird. In British slang, a young woman is called a “bird.” [18] In fact, there is a visual pun when Norman first discovers Marion’s body in the bathroom. He accidentally knocks a picture of a bird off the wall, literally “bumping off the bird”.
Psychoanalytic interpretation
Psycho has been called “the firstpsychoanalytical thriller.”[19]The sex and violence in the film were unlike anything previously seen in a mainstream film. “[T]he shower scene is both feared and desired,” wrotefilm critic Serge Kaganski. “Hitchcock may be scaring his female viewers out of their wits, but he is turning his male viewers into potential rapists, since Janet Leigh has been turning men on ever since she appeared in her brassiere in the first scene.”
Dang gal, that shower scene was epic was it not? To my mind, that scene boldly and unequivocally portrayed Bill as a parasitic MONSTER who has completely taken control of Sookie’s mind. He is DEVOURING HER and will continue to devour her until there is nothing left of her.
And she just allows him to. It was sad and frightening.
Truthfully, I wish they would get it over with and have her meet her fate a la Marion Crane. This slow agonizing death march is beyond the pale.
Back in school today so teacher mode is kicking in. Did anyone figure out who thinks Bill is psycho? Who’s POV?
The camera was flying right with Eric in the opening shot of the episode.
I believe the episodes pov was Eric’s as well.
The sword in his office inside of Fangtasia was a straight Viking sword. However, in previous scenes the sword hanging in his office was not a Viking sword but an 1860 cavalry saber.This curved saber would have not been carried/used by a Viking warrior. This curved cavalry saber would have been found in the US Civil War, especially carried by the officer corps to signal and lead troop direction and charges. One such officer who would have carried such a curved saber would have been 1st Lieutenant Wm Compton.
Excellent point, Dragaonlady! I remember wondering about that curved sword, and it is nowhere to be seen.
I checked for the sword later in the episode to determine if Eric was still narrating, but the back wall isn’t shown again.
MC, you go to the top of the class! The only question is how long does Eric narrate the episode before motor mouth Sookie takes over.
I think it might have been Psycho himself. Remember that odd close-up view of Sookie when she opened the door to Jason’s house?
I’ll remember to check that out on the next viewing.
There is more then one POV in this show
Nan POV with Eric and the AVL
Do we see Nan’s POV or Nan through Eric’s or Sookie’s eyes?
Do we ever walk in Nan’s shoes? IDK. I’ll double check on my next viewing.
What about the pov for the b/s shower scene? puke
That is most definitely Eric’s POV. Eric swoops into FT, Russell returns home, and then Sookie’s in the shower. That whole scene is without a single word of dialog, so Sookie doesn’t have her voice back yet; Eric is still narrating, showing us the reality of Bill and Sookie’s relationship and comparing Bill to Norman Bates. Sookie would NEVER do that.
I think Sookie starts narrating when she discovers the were. Soon after the dialog starts getting weird–
Sookie: Just once I’d like to not find a dead body in my house. (How callous can you get over Gran’s death?)
Nan: Relax it’s not like you killed someone. (How does she know?)
Pam: We’ve lived through so much for so long. It can’t end this quickly. (Pam really has a way with oxymorons!)
Bill: I swear I would never harm her. (You just did, Dumbass, and will again if the same situation presents itself.)
Hadley: You and Jason are the only family I got left. (Uh…what about Hunter?)
And why didn’t Hadley already know Hunter was telepathic? Children are too ungaurded not to let a secret like that out of the bag. And why did Hadley say she has someone she wanted Sookie to meet, but when she got there Sookie acted like she already knew about Hunter. Which is it?
I think that Sookie knew of Hunter’s existence but had never met him.
Ages ago we were discussing how Bill always seemed to have a rational reason to kill someone whenever he was in emotional overload and wanted to lash out. For example, killing Gran cleared the way Bill to become Sookie’s everything, but it was the memories of his family and his turning that enraged him that night and lead to the vicious attack on Gran.
According to secret service report, many political assassination and would-be assassins are like Bill, murderers in search of a reason to kill.
http://www.npr.org/2011/01/14/132909487/fame-through-assassination-a-secret-service-study