Topic RSS
1:20 AM
June 10, 2011
Offline4:43 PM
September 2, 2011
Offlineanna said:
The first few books were a good read. Things went downhill when she allowed Bill to glamour her into allowing him to continue his undead life and appear to be a hero.
LOL.
It irritates the fuck out of me when people say they are certain CH can't be influenced on her story, or that she had this all planned from the get-go, because she ADMITTED that she was talked out of killing off Bill (in D&G) at the last minute by her 'editor'. If she's capable of altering that, she's capable of altering any part of her main storyline. And it also means that none of the Bill-related bullshit from the past two books is any part of some larger/deeper meaning for Sookie's storyline (somebody once said that her nonreaction to Bill in the cubby meant that she was healthy and better, recovered from the rape because she no longer sees Bill as a threat, which just made my brain melt a little). Because none of it was supposed to happen, because Bill should have been dead.
And I was just thinking about the Franklin Mott/Mickey/Tara storyline, and how it was suggested that Tara bore some responsibility for what happened to her. And I don't mean just what Eric said to her, but Sookie's internal narration was trying very hard to convince the reader that Tara's greed and sluttishness were responsible for her plight, she should have known better than to get involved with men like that. Because Franklin was her sugar daddy, she allowed herself to be turned into a possession, so her getting raped by Mickey was kinda her fault a little. Sookie even thought "[Tara] may have repulsed his advances that night, but she hadn't done it instantly and decisively…[Mickey'd] given plenty of advanced warnings of his intentions." This is also the book where Sookie later on wishes Bill could stay with her that night, because he was so gentle the night before when he visited her in the hospital and made her feel cherished…although the night before that he brought another woman into Merlotte's to rub in Sookie's face, and the night before that he nearly broke both her arms because he saw her kissing Sam, but he's a gentle fellow, really…she also calls the trunk rape a 'near rape' although there was nothing near about it and asks Bill to cuddle with her…in retrospect, I don't know how I got through the rest of the series after this book. I think at the time, I was chalking up Sookie's attitude as some fucked-up way of dealing with what happened to her (she spazzed out on Alcide early in the book when he tried to get her to talk about it), that she was projecting onto Tara her own feelings of guilt and responsibility for her rape (which Bill certainly contributed to making her feel this way), and that might have been CH intent, but with what happened in the later books, it now just looks like a pattern of an author with a really fucked-up attitude about rape. Her heroine has warm, fuzzy feelings about her rapist.
4:55 PM
July 16, 2011
OfflineI thought it would be interesting to add what CH wrote in 2007. Has greed and the almighty dollar changed her mind and views? http://www.charlaineharris.com…../bb97.html
| MY POINT OF VIEW I hate to get all dark and serious in this happy season, but I read an article in Romantic Times Booklover’s Magazine that disturbed me greatly. The article discusses the rise and fall — and rise again — of a scenario that lots of readers seem to enjoy. This plot device features “forcible seduction.” (Most sentient beings would call this “rape.”) In the context of the romance world, however, this means a situation where the hero persists in seducing the heroine after she has said, “No.” She really wants to, the writers explain. She’s just saying “No” for reasons that in the end don’t matter very much. Point of View A: This is a fantasy situation we’re talking about here. It’s Point of View B: We’ve spent years – decades – trying to get both females and Point of View A: Lighten up, already! Not too many men read romances, anyway! Point of View B: This is true. And I’ve tried to lighten up, believe me. I I know that romance novels are not realistic. I’ve written some novels that I just can’t do it. I got raped over thirty years ago, and yet there’s not a moment of my life You can see why I consider the inclusion of such scenes to be, at the least, I do feel very strongly about this idea, and I am obliged to speak out, here Charlaine Harris |
|
| © 2009 Charlaine Harris |
5:10 PM
September 2, 2011
OfflinePlease excuse me, I have to smash the keyboard repeatedly into my face.
SHE WROTE A SCENE LIKE THAT. Sookie told Bill to dial it back, he said no, they continued fucking. What, does that not count because Sookie was willingly engaging in sexual relations before she told him to chill?
2007? So that was five books ago, so around-about All Together Dead?
I'm not so sure its greed/money that caused her to produce shit like NCTF, so much as the people around her and her website. Greed/money might be responsible for the general slide in quality, but NCTF wasn't the result of poor quality control or laziness. That was some special fuckery right there.
5:25 PM
July 16, 2011
OfflineI quit reading after book 4 to be honest. I think she's a crappy writer……. it seems that from this answer, she has gotten a taste of the good life.
Has the success of the Stackhouse books shaped your backburner list? Do you now find yourself considering more strongly other supernatural projects?
Well, yes I do. Because I know where the money is, and I know whether for good or ill if I write something supernatural, I'm gonna make big bucks; and if I write something else I might not. And I'm not above considering business when I pick my projects, because that's realistic. Though I know writers who are unrealistic, and I admire them too. They'll say, "No, I'm not gonna write that book. I'm gonna write this book." Everyone is asking Robin McKinley to write a sequel to Sunshine. She won't do it. [Laughs.]
8:45 PM
June 10, 2011
Offline9:41 PM
September 2, 2011
OfflineI guess I could understand the greed cause in that respect (I was thinking more along the lines of 'How is there money in mocking rape?'), but even still, she could have kept the Llamas around without totally debasing her heroine. The scene could have been so much Less Bad if Sookie had just not been naked. But as it stands, it came off as spiteful. Sometimes I think she really hates Sookie, and truly thinks she's dumb and self-centered.
But I do think the herd of Llamas that surrounds and aids her has to be an influence (she had a freaking Llama write a book for her, for fuck's sake). If all she's hearing is "BILL BILL BILL BILL", that could very well be skewing her perception. Although if I wrote about a surfacely charming but obviously douchey, controlling, violent rapist, and then a bunch of my fans were all like "OMG, I love him! He's so romantic! Please have him get back together with his victim!" I would be all "Later, Bitches", but that's just me.
10:15 PM
June 10, 2011
OfflineBack to book bombs…now the lawyer said in DR, that gave the "gift" of mind to the descendants of Adelle and the fairy man. I forget his name. But in the Rhodes book he said that he couldn't read minds. Is there something I may have missed? Because that seems like a lie. Or maybe I overread something.
12:58 AM
June 24, 2010
Offline@Jerron
You're right about Mr. C. lying. On the plane to Rhodes, Sookie is counting coffins
PB pg. 106- Mr. C. to Sookie "You were wondering where the fifth sheriff was."
Sookie – "Yes, but you were maybe a thought or two behind."
Mr. C. - "I'm not telepathic like you, my dear.
So if he lied about that, what else has he lied about?
2:12 AM
June 10, 2011
Offline6:35 AM
June 24, 2010
OfflineDo you think it might have something to do with that Cluvial D'or thing and how it works or how many times it works, or someone is alive that was thought dead? I thought CH said that someone is alive who was thought dead.
There's a joke about lawyers in there somewhere I'm sure, but I don't want to offend.
6:47 AM
June 24, 2010
OfflineI'm going to add my gripes to the NCTF. It always bugged me that Bill was naked down in that hole. He was just sleeping on the dirt not buried in it, or had some sort of mat to lie on. Why couldn't he have put a coffin down there for sleeping?
Heck, at Rhodes there was a vendor selling space-age and traditional coffins. It's not like he couldn't afford one.
For me it goes to CH using a device to keep BL's coming back.
1:00 PM
June 24, 2010
Offline@ BG
There was a TV show called Dead Lawyers
This is a one-hour series with a deliciously judicious concept: sleazy unscrupulous lawyers, in order to redeem themselves, come back from the dead to defend everyone they screwed when they were alive — and it's all pro bono! When hotshot defense attorney Jimmy Quinn is run over by a bus, he finds himself in his own version of hell: a law firm on earth composed of other dead lawyers, all trying to right miscarriages of justice in order to redeem themselves.
Most Users Ever Online: 157
Currently Online:
13 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Bobsgran: 2590
JerronBarksdale: 927
anna: 842
IATM: 810
Exit_Pursued_By_A_Sloth: 642
BellaKarma: 417
Genie: 296
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 0
Members: 1643
Moderators: 0
Admins: 3
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 13
Topics: 309
Posts: 14356
Newest Members: carrie, tawnymac, ravynsprt, pez, Jennifer, Dwimordene, aiyanamichaela, Marianne, blunderwoman, Sass
Moderators:
Administrators: Renée (576), sunny (4369), osterby (1122)
Log In
Register
Home






