Note: This is pretty much the essay I posted at SVB on the Narrative Chairs thread. The last few paragraphs after the emoticon are new and where I really get on my soapbox, so be warned. Bwahahah!
A good theory attempts to explain anomalies that other theories don’t and the POV one is a metatheory that gives perfect context to many the other theories that have been proposed to explain certain aspects of TB. The writers and directors are all unsophisticated and stupid and Alan Ball is in love with Bill doesn’t cut it. These are all very smart, very well educated, talented people who are creating something with many layers of meaning.
A good theory also makes testable predictions. I think the first test was Sunday with the 3.07 broadcast, and the POV theory passed with flying colors. Sunny has long believed we’re getting other character POVs. I wasn’t able to see it (except in 2 dramatic instances) because I’m not intuitive like she is. This week, however, we both arrived at the same conclusion by different means. I examined the structure, and was able to determine that the POV shifted from Sookie to Tara at some point in 3.6. The confirmation was when we walked down the hall in Tara’s footsteps carrying Talbot’s big bowl of almonds. Sookie can show us what it’s like to see through other people’s eyes, but she can’t show us what it’s like to walk in their footsteps. This is ALWAYS a sign that someone else is narrating. Jessica made this point when she told Hoyt that he would never know what it’s like to be a vampire, in other words, he would never be able to walk in her shoes.
In retrospect we can see that Tara’s clear interior voice earlier in 3.6 without Sookie’s usually telepathic distortion was because we were in Tara’s head, not Sookie’s. (The same thing happened when we were in Maxine’s head s1.) Once we realize we’re in Tara’s head, the different characterizations of Jason, Sam, and Bill make sense. They are not just randomly OOC. They are OOC but all how Tara would see them. Even Laffy lost his sex appeal because Tara just doesn’t see him that way.
This is the context, for Lorena’s killing. 3.7 starts with Sookie crying over Bill thinking he’s dead yet in a few minutes she will tell us he’s not dead because he hasn’t turned into vampire goo. This is Tara learning the same lesson Sookie did when she thought burned Bill was dead. Tara has just bashed in FM’s skull. She believes him to be dead. She transfers her error to Sookie and tells us that Sookie is crying because she thinks Bill is dead. Tara only learns what a dead vampire looks at the point in the story that Sookie shows her Lorena’s remains. Bill’s heroics against Lorena despite being drained and chained with silver make no sense because traumatized and ignorant Sookie doesn’t understand how it happened and Tara is relating what Sookie at some point in the future will tell her about it.
You’re right that the narrative mode is complex, but there is just no way Alan Ball would miss a chance to explore POV with a protagonist who is a telepath. That is a once in a lifetime opportunity. Of course no one is intended to figure it out on the first or even the 5th viewing. This is stuff lit geeks live for. I’m sure at some point it will be made clear, probably with the last episode so that everyone will go back and watch with new eyes. I wouldn’t be surprised if HBO follows up the last episode with a replay of the entire series for that purpose.
Viewers may think they’re watching a cheesy soap opera, but, to paraphrase Claudine, don’t be fooled, it’s really much bigger and deeper than it appears to be. Her statement holds a lot of meaning and goes with the song that AB wrote specifically for s2 about digging deeper and deeper. Viewers can snicker at how much smarter and more sophisticated they are than the TB creators, or they can see that fairyland was Tara, with her experience of MA’s orgies, trying to describe how she imagined it from what Sookie told her, which was based more on Sookie’s perceptions than on objective reality. In other words, it was double country ass cheese with a side of MA all the way.
AB isn’t an idiot. He’s a fuckin genius!
Believe it or not, once the narrative mode is revealed, that scene that will be shown in philosophy courses studying Plato’s Symposium. The whole show is an exercise is exploring how we know what we think we know. The characters hint at this when they spread 2nd and 3rd hand information, accept or reject stereotypes, make erroneous first impressions, allow themselves to be persuaded by people with hidden agendas, and when they innocently or deliberately misrepresent something that we know happened differently because we saw it play out. They ignore the truth that is before their eyes and make decisions about what is really happening based on erroneous information and conditioning.
That is exactly what the audience is expected to do too. Are you sure Liam was a vampire? Are you sure Theodore Newlin was married to a woman? Are you sure you know who killed Gran? I’m sorry to say that Eric lovers are not much different than Bill lovers who know that he is Sookie’s true love and HEA because they have a lifetime’s worth of conditioning telling them so. When the time is right, AB will delight in showing BLs the truth of the matter and there will be such shocking revelations about him as to even astound the Bookies. Everyone will have to reevaluate the whole story and make new judgement about what really happened. This is the real intent of the show. This from of manipulation is laid out in Naomi Klein’s book Shock Doctrine (SD).
Tara was reading SD in the pilot episode at Super Save a Bunch, but learning something and experiencing it so that it transforms who you are is two different things. That’s what both Andy and Prince Eric told us a couple episodes back. Tara’s experience with MA showed us the same thing. She could apply the book knowledge she gained from reading the SD to Jason’s situation and wonder if it would create a paradigm shift in him that would allow him to see her in a romantic light, but she was as vulnerable to MA as if she had never read it at all. Alan Ball understands all this and he knows that the real power of drama is to transform (not teach) entire populations in one fell swoop. TB is AB’s attempt to immunize the populace against government, organized religion, and the media’s use of the SD, and he is using every literary and dramatic tool collected in the 2500 year old toolbox that Dionysus bequeathed to the Greeks when he gifted them with theater.















Recent Comments